|
The London Blasts: Pressurising
The Media
Project 1: The Extremism
Report
Contents
1) Today's Project
2) Letters Pages contact
details
3) The Importance Of Pressure
(a new success story
- 15 July)
1) Today's Project: The
'Young Muslims and Extremism' Report
On Sunday, the Sunday
Times carried an important
front-page story on a leaked British Government study
'Young Muslims and Extremism' (see our Media
Review for more details). The key element of this story
(buried in the middle of the article) was the finding that
it is British foreign policy
that has been responsible for the growth of 'extremism'
- the willingness of young Muslims to participate in anti-Western
terrorism:
'The
Iraq war is identified by the dossier as a key cause of
young Britons turning to terrorism. The analysis
says: “It seems that a particularly strong cause of
disillusionment among Muslims, including young Muslims,
is a perceived ‘double standard’ in the foreign
policy of western governments, in particular Britain and
the US.'
' “The
perception is that passive ‘oppression’,
as demonstrated in British foreign policy, eg non-action
on Kashmir and Chechnya, has
given way to ‘active oppression’. The
war on terror, and in Iraq and Afghanistan, are all seen
by a section of British Muslims as having been acts against
Islam.” '
These
are the British Government's own conclusions in a
secret report to the Prime Minister. (More conclusions from
the report here.)
This conclusion was not
highlighted in the Sunday Times
story, and is not being picked up by the mass media.
It is up to us to put
pressure on the Sunday Times, the other newspapers, and
the broadcast media, to report this critical finding.
Please use any opportunity
you have to bring this crucial fact to the attention of
the local and national and international and web-based media.
Opportunity
#1 The ideal hook is a reference to the report itself,
as in the Guardian
today, which carries only this sentence on the report: 'A
joint Home Office and Foreign Office report, Young Muslims
and Extremism, said Britain might now be harbouring thousands
of al-Qaida sympathisers.' A wonderful opportunity
to bring the key finding to the attention of Guardian
readers. (See the list of email addresses below.)
Opportunity
#2 The second-best hook is any reference to there
being, or not being, a connection between the war in Iraq
and the London bombings. Recall this sentence in the Sunday
Times (front page): 'The
Iraq war is identified by the dossier as a key cause of
young Britons turning to terrorism.'
Go to our page: Denial
Monitor, which tracks some of those either denying or
affirming a link between the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan
and the London atrocities
2) Letters Pages contact
details
It is as useful to write
in to praise as it is to criticise. Don't
forget to include your full postal address and daytime/evening
phone numbers in your email. You can also include a link
to the article you're commenting on.
Financial
Times letters page
The
Guardian letters page
The
Independent letters page
The
Observer letters page - make 'Letter to the Editor'
your subject line.
The
Sunday Telegraph letters page
The
Sunday Times letters page
The
Telegraph letters page
The
Times letters page
The
Independent on Sunday letters page (tbc)
BBC Internet, Radio or
Television - email,
phone 08700 100 222 or textphone 08700 100 212
Channel 4 News - email,
join the
forum, or phone 0207 430 4601
ITN Lunchtime News - email,
or text them using the word PULSE followed by your question
or comment to 80088
ITN News in general -
email, phone 0207
833 3000 or viewer
liaison for TV, radio
complaints
3)
The Importance Of Pressure
The atrocities in London
have shocked the world. If we are to avoid perpetuating
an endless cycle of confrontation and violence, we must
force the mass media to acknowledge the truth about the
threat that Britain faces. This threat will only deepen
if the bombings lead to more repression and more military
action. The threat will only be reduced if we end Britain's
participation in injustice around the world. (For more,
read here.)
Writing letters to the
editor, and directly to columnists, ringing phone-in shows,
and complaining about inaccurate coverage, are all valuable.
Critical
letters do get into newspapers. H.A.L.
Alexander got a letter about the Extremism Report into
the Telegraph on 15 July:
Terror Motives
Sir - Downing Street called Charles
Kennedy "naive" for suggesting that the Iraq war
had fuelled terrorism (News, July 13).
But Young Muslims and Extremism, a
report commissioned by Tony Blair and produced by the Home
Office and Foreign Office, stated: "The war on terror,
and in Iraq and Afghanistan, are all seen by a section of
British Muslims as having been acts against Islam."
So the Prime Minister's office brands
an opposition leader naive for suggesting something its
own experts said is true.
H.A.L. Alexander, London SW6
And on the day that this
page was originally posted (11 July 2005), The
Times letters page carried two critical letters as
their lead letters of the day:
London terror bombings:
responses and recriminations
From Mr Bilal Patel
Sir, People who insist that the London attacks (letters,
July 9, etc) have nothing to do with Iraq or Afghanistan
are living in their own fantasy world. There are reports
of threats of retaliation against Muslims because dozens
of people were killed by bombs. Is it not possible that
there might be similar threats against Britain because Western
bombs killed tens of thousands in Iraq and Afghanistan?
The website of the organisation claiming to be behind the
attacks explicitly stated that the attacks are revenge for
Afghanistan and Iraq.
We are being reminded, as we learnt
with Northern Ireland, that what we do in other places may
come with a price nearer home. Politicians who are surrounded
by mountains of security give us sanctimonious speeches
about good and evil whilst the rest of us have to pay the
price of their actions. It is high time that we held them
to account.
BILAL PATEL
bilal__uk@hotmail.com
From Dr Nick Megoran
Sir, The bombers who perpetrated the
terrorist outrage on innocent Londoners this week were not
trying to change “our way of life” as Tony Blair
disingenuously suggested (report, July 8), but rather our
foreign policy. The attacks were inexcusable but not inexplicable.
Osama bin Laden’s past statements indicate that Britain
became a target for him only because of UK backing for America’s
invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq. Tony Blair’s misguided
support of George W. Bush’s illegal and immoral wars
brought this tragedy upon us, and we will never enjoy security
until that policy is reversed.
NICK MEGORAN
Cambridge
This page last updated 15 July 2005
|